@HuffingtonPost: Finally, an online activity even more narcissistic than Googling yourself http://huff.to/PGsuGB
Shared via TweetCaster
Archive for the ‘Social Media’ Category
Facebook Syats
Posted: August 31, 2012 in Social MediaTags: Facebook, monitoring tools, Social media
Pinterest Keeps it Legal
Posted: May 2, 2012 in Branding, Marketing, Social MediaTags: pinterest, Social media, social media law
@_IFB: RT @huffposttech: Pinterest’s new tool keeps it real. Real legal, that is. http://huff.to/JeKM0c
Google + Better than Facebook & Twitter?
Posted: March 14, 2012 in Social MediaTags: Facebook, Google, Social media, Twitter
@wendy_moore: Gr8 reasons here => RT @problogger: 8 Features that Make Google+ Better than Facebook &Twitter http://problo.gr/AvnZGy
Shared via TweetCaster
Carnival Cruise’s Social Media Mistake
Posted: February 16, 2012 in Branding, Social MediaTags: carnival cruise
A Break from Social Media Is Killing Carnival Cruise Lines http://twrt.me/3lbaf2 via @ginidietrich
Groupon Strikes Again: A Must Read for Every Small Business Owner
Posted: December 14, 2011 in Marketing, Social MediaTags: #epicfail, coupon craze, groupon, online marketing tools, small business, small business marketing
http://videos.webpronews.com/2011/02/is-groupon-helping-or-hurting-businesses/
Groupon has made headlines in recent weeks as it prepared for it’s IPO, raising about $700 million.
With power like that, the company should be on every “watch this company” and “buy now” list in existence.
What is rarely talked about, and easily forgotten, are the tens of thousands of businesses across the country Groupon and, similar online couponing services, negatively impacts each year.
The point was hit home again in metro Detroit a few weeks ago when I chatted with a business co-owner I know. Knowing how I felt about the use of Groupon, he called to relay his tale.
It seems his business partner recently made the decision to run a promotion through the online discounter.
The good news was that the promotion was tremendously successful. The bad news was that the promotion was tremendously successful.
The phone hasn’t stopped ringing off the hook and the business can’t keep up.
The cost of the promotion is overwhelming and actually strangling the company’s operations.
If we look at the anatomy of such a promotion, we can estimate it’s true cost and impact on a business.
Take for example that you own a sun tanning salon and sell five visits at a rate of $10. As owner, your rudimentary cost to provide services is $5. Groupon is estimated to take about 52 percent of the original promotion. In our example, that’s $5.20.
So after you subtract the online coupon company’s $5.20′ he remaining $4.80 doesn’t cover costs, leaving the owner $.40 in the hole for every item sold. It also prevents existing customers from using slots booked by deal-seeking Grouponers. And don’t forget the cost of the added time and manpower needed to handle calls and book these appointments, which can easily reach thousands.
This is a very low cost example and business owners often suffer a much greater loss.
It doesn’t take much work online to find stories from small business owners who have been taken advantage of by Groupon. The following was excerpted from http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-03-14/strategy/30079937_1_groupon-s-ceo-andrew-mason-groupon-offer-business-owners :
“Jessie Burke, the owner of Posies Café in Portland, said her experience with Groupon proved to be too much to handle. Not only did she underestimate the number of shoppers her Groupon promotion might attract, the discount offer itself was too generous.
Groupon’s CEO Andrew Mason called the ordeal, which Burke detailed on a post to Posies’ blog that went viral, “painful.” Groupon seeks to be a win-win for business owners and consumers alike, he says. Although he acknowledges that the serviceisn’tperfect,hesaysGroupon iswilling to considernew ideas. “It means a lot to us to make these promotions successful,”hesays.
Meantime, business owners like Burke can pay a steep price for marketing experiments. While Posies’ foot trafficshot up by about a third after the promotion, the majority of her new customers did not spend above the valueof theGroupon offer. Many of them used multiple Groupons at a time. They also neglected to tip staff members, attempted to use expired coupons and subsequently became irate with staff members when they were refused.
‘I consider it the single worst decision I’ve ever made as a business owner,’ says Burke. “I could have done a lot more advertising for $10,000 with a lot less frustration.’”
During my research, I even found a Facebook page dedicated to this “cause” ( http://www.facebook.com/pages/Groupon-Hurts-Small-Businesses/182054251815316?sk=wall). The number of fans is ” one,” as many business owners mourn their losses in silence.
While Groupon and other companies like it are in the business to make money (totally fair), they need to be held accountable for devising promotions with their clients that work for both parties.– otherwise they both end up with egg on their face.
Using our tanning example, that would mean we could reasonably expect the discount coupon sales rep to put into perspective for the business owner the cap on the coupon. If the owner sells 1,000 certificates, that actually translates into 5,000 visits! If his five tanning booths work 8 hours a day, a visit (say) lasts a half hour, and all certificates need to be redeemed within three-months, can the owner fit in enough regular paying customers to sustain himself? PS- He’s closed on Sundays.
Flashbacks of elementary school story problems? I thought so.
He’ll be able to do it, but that’s as long as he books every available slot and always is open 6 days a week for those three months. He’ll have to say goodbye to regular customers who didn’t purchase a coupon. He just can’t fit them in. And he’ll need to pay his employees, who will still need to come to work and be paid while he’s running the coupon redemption period. Oh, yeah. Don’t forget the money he has to pay the coupon.
What about all the “new” customers he found through Groupon, you ask? Won’t they be there to support the tanning salon in the future?
No. Informal surveys on small business owners who have used Groupon often indicate that businesses see a giant uptick in business traffic from the promotion and then never see those people again. They come in to redeem their coupon and that’s it. They are bargain hunters and business loyalty often takes a backseat to the deal of the day. They are always waiting for the next great deal in their inbox.
That’s not to say a promotion like this is NEVER right for a business. You may want to draw a crowd to attract the attention of shoppers in nearby businesses. When he see all the people walking out of your store and through the mall with your logo emblazoned bags, you might catch their attention: “What is this place? I’ ve never heard of it, but I keep seeing people walking by with their bags. I should check this place out!”
There are probably other reasons, too.
But all require a large financial investment on the part of the business owner. Many times this investment is more than a small business owner can handle and he’s not made aware of the risks through the online discounter.
In an age where we’re working to support small business and ” shop local,” it’s a travesty that organizations like Groupon are allowed to operate as they do.
Social Overload
Posted: November 18, 2011 in Social MediaTags: Facebook, Google, Social media, Twitter
@IMandSocMedia: Social burnout: I am officially sick and tired of chasing social platforms: Being in the Internet marketing spac… http://bit.ly/vYiREi
Facebook Exodus
Posted: September 25, 2011 in IT, Marketing, Social MediaTags: Facebook, Social media
All Things In Moderation. . .Including Consumer E-blasts
Posted: September 15, 2011 in Branding, IT, Marketing, Social Media
A recent article in the August issue of Direct Marketing magazine caught me by surprise. The publication dedicated space to a case study on a product which allowed email blast list subscribers to take a hiatus from the list, for I believe up to about 90 days, as opposed to simply opting out.
Instead of demonstrating to readers a viable application for the product, they were introduced to an outdoor retailer set in their ways and determined to blast to their customers with a great ferocity. . .whether the emails being distributed were wanted or not.
The representative from the company using the product explained the product was not a stopping point. They intended to advance email software options and allow subscribers greater control over their “opt ins” in the future.
First, if as a company marketing representative, you have to pursue this type of software, your company has a problem. It means that there has been significant backlash from members of your subscriber list-enough that you’ve been motivated to actually take action. As a business, the message is that you’re not doing something right. Perhaps, it would make sense for the company to review the frequency with which it distributes such material. The quickest and simplest solution would be to reduce the frequency of consumer contact.
Secondly, it’s concerning that there is no rush to alter the system and the method for making this transition is piecemeal. The ability to opt in and specify, which blasts you’d like to receive from a singular organization has been available for several years. Not sure why a transition tool would be required. This particular organization sends blasts twice per week. At a time when people are often trying to simplify their in box clutter and remove themselves from e-blast lists, a good web company can make the opt in process relatively painless. At the very least, subscribers can be invited to opt in/out for Monday or Thursday (or whatever day it is these blasts are distributed). More advanced options can be added at a later date as needed. This, to me, would seem like a better start than letting customers take a 90 day hiatus because you’re clogging their in-boxes.
Not a case study of a company with a successful product to help manage email blasts, but an example of a company that doesn’t understand how to review the feedback it gains from its consumers and act accordingly.
Do you agree?
The Case of the Killer QR Code
Posted: September 15, 2011 in Marketing, Retail, Social Media, UncategorizedTags: Jeremy Restaurant, marketing, QR Codes, Social media, Water Tower

QR Codes are all the rage these days. They’re very hip and fashionable. From in-store product displays to the pages of magazines like Vogue you spot them. And if you’re hip and cool and fashionable. . .you know how to use them. No instruction needed.
The challenge is that at least the hip and cool people know how to use them, but the businesses grappling to reach the Generation Y consumers often don’t.
Take the example of the billboard for Water Tower Place as displayed in Union Station in Chicago. In a high traffic area, the billboard begs for the QR Code to be scanned. But if a hipster stops to do so, they get plowed over by people in a hurry. . .people who aren’t in the leisurely mood for those playing with their mobile toys.
Because that’s exactly what’s happening. Marketing folks want to involve their potential consumers in a game. Tell them their company is hip and cool like them. But there’s no need. In this instance, a busy walkway at Union Station isn’t the right place to play games. The folks at Water Tower know this. That’s why they placed the website address on the billboard too. It’s actually easy to remember, allowing people to look up the information when it’s an opportune time for them. . .when they aren’t as likely to be run over when they stop to pull out there smartphone, find the right app and then line the camera up with the QR code icon. . . .a least the code signals Water Tower is hip and cool, in case you ever doubted.
If our hipster does manage to scan the code and survive, there is little chance he can do anything with the information he obtains (in this case a very skeletal listing of upcoming events). He’s either coming or going and the last thing on his mind is getting a partial outline of upcoming promos at the local mall.
On the flip side, Jeremy Restaurant & Bar in Keego Harbor, Michigan has hit the nail on the head. Their ad in the Detroit Free Press celebrates their bar menu with outstanding prices and fun attitude. When you can their QR code, users get the full bar menu. It takes advantage of the right media as well. It’s located in the newspapers entertainment section with entertainment and food offerings. It’s the source people preview as they’re making their plans to go out. They have plenty of time to scan. And when they do scan, they will be surprised to find information that’s relevant. After all, the bar ad caught their eye.
Facebook Sponsored Stories Achieving Success
Posted: July 16, 2011 in Social MediaTags: advertising, Facebook
@fastcompany: Facebook Sponsored Stories Performing 2 Times Better Than Standard Ads http://bit.ly/nTXmZx
